Redistribution and Productivity: Cash Transfers and the Role of Consumer Demand
(with Agustina Colonna and Marco Medina)
This paper shows that who receives a cash transfer shapes not only redistribution but also the composition of local demand, the allocation of labor between formal and informal firms, and aggregate productivity. We exploit the 2019 universalization of Mexico’s non-contributory pension, which extended pension benefits across the income distribution. Using difference-in-differences designs at the household and municipality levels, we find that beneficiary households increased consumption by 5.7%, with spending disproportionately directed toward formal establishments, consistent with non-homotheticities in formal-sector demand. Formal employment increased by 6.1% in municipalities highly exposed to the reform relative to less exposed municipalities, with no statistically significant effect on informal employment. This expansion was concentrated among firms in industries where household estimates show the largest increases in demand. Formalization gains were larger where new beneficiaries ranked higher in the local resource distribution and where the rise in transfers was driven by expanded coverage to richer households rather than increased benefits for existing recipients. These patterns are consistent with a demand-led reallocation toward the formal sector induced by the pension reform. A sufficient-statistic calculation shows that the transfer-induced reallocation raised aggregate productivity by 0.32%. A model in which the marginal propensity to spend formally rises with household resources and formal firms face larger average labor wedges rationalizes these findings.